System Engineering and Productivity

System Engineering and Productivity

Presenting a Prescriptive Model for Interactive Systems in the Field of Iranian E-government

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, University of Eyvanekey, Eyvanekey, Ir
Abstract
Responding to demands is one of the main issues facing the government in the discussion of e-government. With the increase in administrative workload, the development of interactive systems becomes inevitable. This research seeks to provide a prescriptive model for interactive systems in the field of e-government in Iran. This research is of a survey type in terms of its developmental purpose and in terms of data collection. The statistical population of this research includes all employees of the Central Civil Registration Organization of Tehran who have at least a bachelor's degree and their type of cooperation with the organization is formal or contractual. The sampling method of the research was a complete count and a total of 212 questionnaires were collected for analysis. The findings of the research, after confirming the model fit indices, indicate the confirmation of the stages of e-government maturity. At the end of the research, a prescriptive model for interactive systems in the field of e-government in Iran was presented based on the findings.
Keywords

Copyright ©, Sayyed Ahmad Hosseini

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Alampay, Gigo & Umali, Joel. (2007) “High Impact, Pro-Poor e-Governance Applications: Identifying “Killer Applications” and Best Practice Models of e-Governance Through Community e-Centers in the Philippines.” United
Nations Development Programme, 2007
.
AlcaideMuñoz, L., RodríguezBolívar, M. P., Cobo, M. J., & HerreraViedma, E. (2017). Analysing the scientific evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 545-555.

Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Whye-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161-173.
Biddick, Michael. (2009) “Government IT Priorities,” InformationWeek Government. http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/enterprise-architecture/218500752 (July 18,2009).Bouallouche, Y., Chenouard, R., Da Cunha, C., & Bernard, A. (2017).
Organizational Interoperability Between Public and Private Actors in an Extended Administration. Enterprise Interoperability: INTEROP PGSO Vision, 1, 151-165.

Brownsword, L., Carney, D. J., Fisher, D., Lewis, G., Morris, E. J., Place, R. R.,Smith, J., Wrage, L., & Meyers, B. C. (2004) “Current Perspectives on
Interoperability (CMU/SEI-2004-TR-009).” Software Engineering Institute,Carnegie Mellon University, 2004.
Cabral, I., & Grilo, A. (2018). Impact of Business Interoperability on the Performance of Complex Cooperative Supply Chain Networks: A Case Study. Complexity, 2018.
Chatfield, A. T., & AlAnazi, J. (2015). Collaborative governance matters to e-government interoperability: An analysis of citizen-centric integrated interoperable e-government implementation in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 2(3), 24-44.

Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., & Vernadat, F. (2008); “Architectures for Enterprise Integration and Interoperability: Past, Present and Future”, Computers in Industry, no.59 (7), pp.647-659.
de Boer, L., Gaytan, J. and Arroyo, P. (2006), "A satisficing model of outsourcing", Supply Chain Management, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 444-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540610682462
Dos Santos, Ernani Marques. (2008). "Implementing Interoperability standards for electronic government". International Journal of electronic government research: Vo. 4, Issue 3, pp. 103-112
.929
Eckman, B. A., Bennett, C. A., Kaufman, J. H., & Tenner, J. W. (2007).Varieties of interoperabilityin the transformation of the health-careinformation infrastructure. IBM Systems Journal, 46(1), 19−41.
Evans, G. (2017). Implementing e-government: An executive report for civil servants and their advisors. Routledge.

Ford, Thomas C., Colombi, John M., Graham, Scott R., & Jacques, David R.(2007) “A Survey on Interoperability Measurement.” Proceedings of the 12th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium.
Newport, RI, June 2007.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18,No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Fraser, M.D. and Vaishnavi, V.K. (1997) ‘A formal specifications maturity model’, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp.95–103.

Gascó, M. (2012). Approaching e-government interoperability. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 3- 6.

Gericke, A., Rohner, P., & Winter, R. (2006). Vernetzungsfähigkeit im Gesundheitswesen-Notwendigkeit, Bewertung und systematische Entwicklung als Voraussetzung zur Erhöhung der Wirtschaftlichkeit administrativer Prozesse. HMD-Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 43(251),20- 30.

Ghorbanizadeh, V.; Hosseinimaram, SMT. (2014) "Dimensions and Indicators of E-Government Interoperability Measurement in Public and Police Organizations" Journal of Resource Management in Law Enforcement,Volume 2, Number 1, Spring 2014, Pp. 208-179.(In Persian)

Gibbons, Patricia, et al. (2007) Coming to Terms: Scoping Interoperability for Health Care. EHR Interoperability Work Group, 2007.

Gottschalk, P. (2009). “Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government”. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (2009) 75–81.

Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2006). “Maturity model for IT outsourcing relationships”. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(2), 200−212.

Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2009). Stages of e-government interoperability. In E-Government Interoperability and Information Resource integration: Frameworks for Aligned Development (pp. 108-123). IGI Global.

Gouscos, D., Kalikakis, M., Legal, M., & Papadopoulou, S. (2007). A general model of performance and quality for one-stop e-government service offerings. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 860−885.

Guédria, Wided; Chen, David; Naudet, Yannick (2009)’A Maturity Model for Enterprise Interoperability’ Enterprise Information Systems · November2009.
922
Havlik, D., & Kutschera, K. (2018, April). Framework for Enabling Technical and Organizational Interoperability in the Management of Environmental Crises and Disasters. In Environmental Software Systems. Computer Science
for Environmental Protection: 12th IFIP WG 5.11 International Symposium,ISESS 2017, Zadar, Croatia, May 10-12, 2017, Proceedings (Vol. 507, p.290). Springer.

Hoel, Tore & Hollins, Paul. (2009) “Could European eGovernment Policy Initiatives, in Effect, Be Stifling the Development of Learning Technologies?”239241.
Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Riga, Latvia, July 2009. IEEE Computer SocietyPress, 2009.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. R. (2008). “Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit.” The
Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods Volume 6 Issue 1 2008, pp. 53 - 60, available
online at
www.ejbrm.com. Jimenez, C. E., Solanas, A., & Falcone, F. (2014). E-government interoperability: Linking open and smart government. Computer, 47(10), 22-24.
King, W. R., & Teo, T. S. H. (1997). Integration between business planning and
information systems planning: Validating a stage hypothesis. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 279−307.
Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
Translated By: Sadr al-Sadat S.J. & Minai A.(In Persian)
Kline, R. B. (2011).
Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), Handbook of methodological innovation in social research methods (pp. 562-589). London: Sage.
Klischewski, Ralf & Abubakr, Ranwa. (2010) “Can e-Government Adopters Benefit from a Technology First Approach? The Case of Egypt Embarking on Service-Oriented Architecture.” Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Koloa, HI, Jan. 2010. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2010.

Kubicek, Herbert, RalfCimander and Hans Jochen Scholl. (2011)“Organizational Interoperability in E-Government.” Springer
.
Lallana, E. C. (2007). e-Government Interoperability: A Review of GovernmentInteroperability Frameworks in Selected Countries. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). http://www. apdip. net/projects/gif/GIF-Review. pdf, alındığı tarih, 17,2009.

Lewis, Grace, Morris, Edwin, Simanta, Soumya, & Wrage, Lutz. (2008) “Why Standards Are Not Enough to Guarantee End-to-End Interoperability,” 164–173. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Composition-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS 2008). Madrid, Spain, Feb. 2008. IEEEComputer Society Press, 2008.
925
Malinauskiene, Egle. (2013). "Conceptual Framework for Context-Based E-Government Interoperability Development ". Social Technologies: 3(1), pp.68-84.

Mecca, G., Santomauro, M., Santoro, D., & Veltri, E. (2016). On federated single sign-on in e-government interoperability frameworks. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 8(1), 6-21.

Mettler, T. (2011) ‘Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach’, Int. J. Society Systems Science, Vol. 3, Nos. 1/2, pp.81-98.
Retrieved from.
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/214426/1/IJSSS0301-0205%2520 METTLER.pdf Naudet, Y., Latour, T., Guedria, W., & Chen, D. (2010). Towards a systemic formalisation of interoperability. Computers in Industry, 61(2), 176-185.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14- 37.

Papazoglou, M. P., & Ribbers, P. M. A. (2006). E-business: Organizational and technical
foundations. UK, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Pardo, T. A., & Tayi, G. K. (2007). Interorganizational information integration:A key enabler for digital government. Government Information Quarterly,24, 691−715. Abstract Received https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.giq.2007.08.004
Pardo, T. A., & Tayi, G. K. (2007). Interorganizational information integration:A key enabler for digital government. Government Information Quarterly,24, 691−715. Abstract Received
https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.giq.2007.08.004.
Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2011). E-government interoperability:interaction of policy, management and technology dimensions. Social sciencecomputing review, DOS 10.1177/ 0894439310392184.

Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C.V. (1993) ‘Capability maturity model, version 1.1’, IEEE Software, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.18–27.

Pereira, G. V., Macadar, M. A., Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2017).
Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213-229.

Rezaei, Reza, Thiam Kian Chiew, Sai Peck Lee, Zeinab Shams Aliee. (2013)."Interoperability evaluation models: A systematic review". Elsevier:Computers in Industry. pp.1-23.

Rezaiyan, Ali. (2000) Foundations of Organization and Management, Tehran:Samt Publishing. (In Persian)

Rhazale, A., & Bounabat, B. (2018, May). A Review of the Governement Information Systems of Organizational Interoperability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Optimization Algorithms: Theory
and Applications (p. 39). ACM.

Rufín, R., Bélanger, F., Molina, C. M., Carter, L., & Figueroa, J. C. S. (2018). A cross-cultural comparison of electronic government adoption in Spain and the
922USA. In Technology Adoption and Social Issues: Concepts, Methodologies,
Tools, and Applications (pp. 476-493). IGI Global.

Saekow, A. and Boonmee, C. (2009) “A Pragmatic Approach to Interoperability Practical
Implementation Support (IPIS) for e-Government Interoperability.”
Electronic Journal of e-Government, Volume 7 Issue 4 2009, (pp403- 414),available online at www.ejeg.com.
Scholl, H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8), 889−920.

Sharma, R., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2015). Developing a roadmap for planning and implementation of interoperability capability in e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(4), 426-447.

Sheehan, N. T. (2005). Why old tools won't work in the “new” knowledge economy.
Journal of Business Strategy, 26, 53−60.
Tolk, A. & Muguira, J. A. (2003) “The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model.” Presented at the 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop,Orlando, FL, Sep. 2003.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2016).
“United Nations E-Government Survey 2016.” UNDESA 2016.
Valacich, J., & Schneider, C. (2009). Information Systems Today: Managing the Digital World. Prentice Hall Press. Translated By: Ghorbanizadeh V. & Hosseinimaram SMT.(In Persian)
West, D. M. (2004). E government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public administration review, 64(1), 15- 27.

Weston, R., & Gore, P.A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist. 34, 719.

Yongsoo Kim, Tim Kelly, and Siddhartha Raja (2010) “Building broadband:Strategies and policies for the developing world.” In: Global Information and Communication Technologies (GICT) Department World Bank January 2010
.
Zarko, I. P., Soursos, S., Gojmerac, I., Ostermann, E. G., Insolvibile, G.,Plociennik, M.,... & Bianchi, G. (2017, June). Towards an IoT framework for semantic and organizational interoperability. In Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), 2017 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Zynoddini, M, (2014). “eGovernment Interoperability Framework”. Retrieved from:
http://zynoddini.ir
Volume 2, Issue 2 - Serial Number 3
Serial No. 3, Summer Quarterly
Summer 2022
Pages 85-104

  • Receive Date 24 August 2022
  • Revise Date 16 September 2022
  • Accept Date 19 September 2022
  • First Publish Date 19 September 2022
  • Publish Date 23 August 2022