System Engineering and Productivity

System Engineering and Productivity

Dynamic Analysis of Green Technological Innovation Ecosystem Challenges Considering the Collaboration of Technology Companies and Startups Under Government Intervention

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Mohammad-Ali Eghbali 1
Morteza Rasti Barzoki 2
Soroush Safarzadeh 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Computer and Industrial Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran
2 Corresponding author: Professor, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Systems, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Quchan University of Technology, Quchan, Iran
10.22034/msb.2023.711493
Abstract
In today's complex competitive environment, technology companies need to create technological innovation continuously. Over time, they are required to implement green technological innovation under the influence of pressures from stakeholders active in the innovation ecosystem. The most important stakeholders present in the innovation ecosystem include technology companies, startups, accelerators and growth centers, end consumers, and the government. Therefore, considering the dynamic nature of the problem, integrated management of potential challenges is essential and inevitable. In this article, after identifying the most important challenges of the green technological innovation ecosystem with a qualitative approach, an attempt has been made to examine the interactions between active elements and analyze the behavior of the main variables of the problem in the form of feedback loops. The results, in the form of three subsystems, identify important feedback loops and, after determining their polarity, describe the dynamics of the green technological innovation ecosystem. The way in which stakeholders interact and the conditions governing the system structure, as well as government intervention, can be effective in managing the relevant challenges and balancing the system in the long term.
Keywords
Green technological innovation
Green innovation chain
Startup financing mechanisms
Collaboration mechanisms
System dynamics
Subjects

Copyright ©, Mohammad-Ali Eghbali, Morteza Rasti Barzoki, Soroush Safarzadeh

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

[1]         T. Li, Y. Li, D. An, Y. Han, S. Xu, Z. Lu, J. Crittenden, Mining of the association rules between industrialization level and air quality to inform high-quality development in China, J. Environ. Manage. 246 (2019) 564–574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.022.
[2]         S. Zhao, Y. Jiang, S. Wang, Innovation stages, knowledge spillover, and green economy development: moderating role of absorptive capacity and environmental regulation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26 (2019) 25312–25325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05777-9.
[3]         F. Friedfinnsson, S.D. Stefansson, Startup Collaboration as a Part of Corporate Innovation, (2019).
[4]         M. Larkin, D. O’Halloran, Collaboration between Start-ups and Corporates, A Practical Guide for Mutual Understanding, World Econ. Forum (2018) 3–21. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_White_Paper_Collaboration_between_Start-ups_and_Corporates.pdf%0Ahttps://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1218063.1217968.
[5]         K. Thieme, The strategic use of corporate-startup engagement, (n.d.).
[6]         X. Li, Z. Hu, Q. Zhang, Environmental regulation, economic policy uncertainty, and green technology innovation, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 23 (2021) 2975–2988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02219-4.
[7]         X. Luo, W. Zhang, Green innovation efficiency: a threshold effect of research and development, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 23 (2021) 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01977-x.
[8]         P.L. Show, P.L. Lau, D.C.Y. Foo, Green technologies: innovations, challenges, and prospects, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 20 (2018) 1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1605-4.
[9]         M.A.S. de Jesus, A.R. de Aguiar Dutra, C.B.S. Cirani, K.R.E. Jesus, R.C.S. Neto, J.B.A. Guerra, Eco-innovation assessment of biodigesters technology: an application in cassava processing industries in the south of Brazil, Parana state, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (2022) 931–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02232-7.
[10]       F. Zhang, L. Zhu, Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 28 (2019) 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2298.
[11]       J. Zhang, G. Liang, T. Feng, C. Yuan, W. Jiang, Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 29 (2020) 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2349.
[12]       J. Liu, M. Zhao, Y. Wang, Impacts of government subsidies and environmental regulations on green process innovation: A nonlinear approach, Technol. Soc. 63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101417.
[13]       M. yue Wang, Y. Li, Z. Cheng, C. Zhong, W. Ma, Evolution and equilibrium of a green technological innovation system: Simulation of a tripartite game model, J. Clean. Prod. 278 (2021) 123944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123944.
[14]       L. Qiu, D. Hu, Y. Wang, How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 29 (2020) 2695–2714. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2530.
[15]       H. Badri Ahmadi, H.W. Lo, H. Gupta, S. Kusi-Sarpong, J.J.H. Liou, Analyzing interrelationships among environmental sustainability innovation factors, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 24 (2022) 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02086-z.
[16]       Z. Sun, W. Zhang, Do government regulations prevent greenwashing ? An evolutionary game analysis of heterogeneous enterprises, J. Clean. Prod. 231 (2019) 1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.335.
[17]       S. Zhang, Y. Yu, Q. Zhu, C.M. Qiu, A. Tian, Green innovation mode under carbon tax and innovation subsidy: An evolutionary game analysis for portfolio policies, Sustain. 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041385.
[18]       L. Wei, B. Lin, Z. Zheng, W. Wu, Y. Zhou, Does fiscal expenditure promote green technological innovation in China? Evidence from Chinese cities, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106945.
[19]       H. Zarei, M. Rasti-barzoki, I. Moon, A mechanism design approach to a buyer ’ s optimal auditing policy to induce responsible sourcing in a supply chain, J. Environ. Manage. 254 (2020) 109721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109721.
[20]       S. Rosenkranz, Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety, J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 50 (2003) 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00047-1.
[21]       X. Xie, J. Huo, H. Zou, Green process innovation , green product innovation , and corporate financial performance : A content analysis method ☆, J. Bus. Res. 101 (2019) 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010.
[22]       Y. Eiadat, A. Kelly, F. Roche, H. Eyadat, Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy, J. World Bus. 43 (2008) 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.012.
[23]       W. Wu, L. Sheng, F. Tang, A. Zhang, J. Liu, A system dynamics model of green innovation and policy simulation with an application in Chinese manufacturing industry, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 28 (2021) 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.007.
[24]       S. Hu, S. Liu, Do the coupling effects of environmental regulation and R&D subsidies work in the development of green innovation? Empirical evidence from China, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 21 (2019) 1739–1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01745-6.
[25]       M. Wang, Y. Li, J. Li, Z. Wang, Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model, J. Environ. Manage. 297 (2021) 113282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113282.
[26]       X. Xie, Q. Zhu, R. Wang, Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms’ green image, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 28 (2019) 1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323.
[27]       S.U. Rehman, S. Kraus, S.A. Shah, D. Khanin, R. V. Mahto, Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120481.
[28]       S. Kumar, M. Del, R. Chierici, D. Graziano, Technological Forecasting & Social Change Green innovation and environmental performance : The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management, 150 (2020).
[29]       M. Wang, Z. Cheng, Y. Li, J. Li, K. Guan, Impact of market regulation on economic and environmental performance: A game model of endogenous green technological innovation, J. Clean. Prod. 277 (2020) 123969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123969.
[30]       S. Kraus, S. Ur, F.J. Sendra, Technological Forecasting & Social Change Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance : The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation, 160 (2020).
[31]       H. Zameer, Y. Wang, D.G. Vasbieva, Q. Abbas, Exploring a pathway to carbon neutrality via reinforcing environmental performance through green process innovation, environmental orientation and green competitive advantage, J. Environ. Manage. 296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113383.
[32]       R. Garcia, K. Wigger, R.R. Hermann, Challenges of creating and capturing value in open eco-innovation: Evidence from the maritime industry in Denmark, J. Clean. Prod. 220 (2019) 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.027.
[33]       Y. Wang, X. Wang, S. Chang, Y. Kang, Product innovation and process innovation in a dynamic Stackelberg game, Comput. Ind. Eng. 130 (2019) 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.042.
[34]       D. Xia, M. Zhang, Q. Yu, Y. Tu, Developing a framework to identify barriers of Green technology adoption for enterprises, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 143 (2019) 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.022.
[35]       H. Gao, X.H. Ding, S. Wu, Exploring the domain of open innovation: Bibliometric and content analyses, J. Clean. Prod. 275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122580.
[36]       V. Chistov, N. Aramburu, J. Carrillo-Hermosilla, Open eco-innovation: A bibliometric review of emerging research, J. Clean. Prod. 311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127627.
[37]       W. Ma, R. Zhang, S. Chai, What drives green innovation? A game theoretic analysis of government subsidy and cooperation contract, Sustain. 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205584.
[38]       H. Wu, S. Hu, The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation, J. Clean. Prod. 274 (2020) 122682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122682.
[39]       Q. Zhou, X. Zhang, Q. Shao, X. Wang, The non-linear effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution: Empirical evidence for 277 Chinese cities during 2002–2010, J. Environ. Manage. 248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109274.
[40]       P.D. Hegeman, R. Sørheim, Why do they do it? Corporate venture capital investments in cleantech startups, J. Clean. Prod. 294 (2021) 126315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126315.
[41]       P. Demirel, Q.C. Li, F. Rentocchini, J.P. Tamvada, Born to be green: new insights into the economics and management of green entrepreneurship, Small Bus. Econ. 52 (2019) 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9933-z.
[42]       F. Simon, R. Harms, H. Schiele, Managing corporate-startup relationships: What matters for entrepreneurs?, Int. J. Entrep. Ventur. 11 (2019) 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2019.098770.
[43]       R. Zhang, B. Sun, A competitive dynamics perspective on evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, and innovation in high-tech firms, Manag. Decis. 58 (2020) 948–966. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0666.
[44]       M. Zhou, K. Govindan, X. Xie, How fairness perceptions, embeddedness, and knowledge sharing drive green innovation in sustainable supply chains: An equity theory and network perspective to achieve sustainable development goals, J. Clean. Prod. 260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120950.
[45]       M.A. Eghbali, M. Rasti-Barzoki, S. Safarzadeh, A hybrid evolutionary game-theoretic and system dynamics approach for analysis of implementation strategies of green technological innovation under government intervention, Technol. Soc. 70 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102039.
[46]       F. Pinkow, J. Iversen, Strategic objectives of corporate venture capital as a tool for open innovation, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 6 (2020) 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040157.
[47]       M. Hossain, H. Simula, Recycling the unused ideas and technologies of a large corporation into new business by start-ups, Technol. Soc. 48 (2017) 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.10.005.
[48]       Jack Mason, Entrepreneurship in knowledge-based services: Opportunity and challenges for new venture, economic, and workforce development, J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 10 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352673418300374.
[49]       T. Weiblen, H.W. Chesbrough, Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation, Calif. Manage. Rev. 57 (2015) 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66.
[50]       G. Chapman, H. Hottenrott, Green start-ups and the role of founder personality, J. Bus. Ventur. Insights 17 (2022) e00316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00316.
[51]       L. Bergset, L. Bergset, Green start-up finance – where do particular challenges lie ?, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0260.
[52]       T. Kohler, Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups, Bus. Horiz. 59 (2016) 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.008.
[53]       X. Zhang, Q. Meng, Y. Le, How Do New Ventures Implementing Green Innovation Strategy Achieve Performance Growth?, Sustain. 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042299.
[54]       J. ling Jiao, X. lan Zhang, Y. shu Tang, What factors determine the survival of green innovative enterprises in China? -- A method based on fsQCA, Technol. Soc. 62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101314.
[55]       P.T.I. Lam, A.O.K. Law, Crowdfunding for renewable and sustainable energy projects: An exploratory case study approach, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60 (2016) 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.046.
[56]       L. Cacciolatti, A. Rosli, J.L. Ruiz-Alba, J. Chang, Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission, J. Bus. Res. 106 (2020) 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047.
[57]       Y. Deng, D. You, J. Wang, Optimal strategy for enterprises’ green technology innovation from the perspective of political competition, J. Clean. Prod. 235 (2019) 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.248.
[58]       W. Ma, R. Zhang, S. Chai, What Drives Green Innovation ? A Game Theoretic Analysis of Government Subsidy and Cooperation Contract, (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205584.
[59]       Z. Ai, Enterprise ’ s Innovation Behavior Choice under the Government Subsidy--Analysis Based on Signaling Game, 28 (2019) 2369–2376.
[60]       M. Wang, Z. Cheng, Y. Li, J. Li, K. Guan, Impact of market regulation on economic and environmental performance : A game model of endogenous green technological innovation, J. Clean. Prod. 277 (2020) 123969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123969.
[61]       H. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Miao, Evolutionary game analysis on the selection of green and low carbon innovation between manufacturing enterprises, Alexandria Eng. J. 60 (2021) 2139–2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.015.
[62]       X. Ding, T. Guo, Z. Guo, Research on Innovation Strategy Choice of Science and Technology Entrepreneurial Firms Based on Technological Innovation Input, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93351-1.
[63]       C. Zhang, Evolutionary Game of Technology Innovation Investment in Supply Chain Enterprises with Government Subsidy Mechanism, 233 (2018) 1359–1364.
[64]       Q. Zhang, Rethink the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Green Technology Innovation in Coastal Cities, J. Coast. Res. 115 (2020) 481–484. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI115-133.1.
[65]       Y. Zhang, R. Fan, M. Luo, M. Chen, J. Sun, Evolutionary Game Analysis of Firms’ Technological Strategic Choices: A Perspective of the Behavioral Biases, Complexity 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4294125.
[66]       J.E. de Bettignies, J.A. Brander, Financing entrepreneurship: Bank finance versus venture capital, J. Bus. Ventur. 22 (2007) 808–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.07.005.
[67]       M. Vergara, C.A. Bonilla, J.P. Sepulveda, The complementarity effect: Effort and sharing in the entrepreneur and venture capital contract, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254 (2016) 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.040.
[68]       R. Elitzur, A. Gavious, Contracting, signaling, and moral hazard: A model of entrepreneurs, “angels,” and venture capitalists, J. Bus. Ventur. 18 (2003) 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00027-2.
[69]       R. Elitzur, A. Gavious, Selection of entrepreneurs in the venture capital industry: An asymptotic analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215 (2011) 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.029.
[70]       Y. Liu, A. Wang, Y. Wu, Environmental regulation and green innovation : Evidence from China ’ s new environmental protection law, J. Clean. Prod. 297 (2021) 126698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126698.
[71]       M. Shahzad, Y. Qu, A.U. Zafar, X. Ding, S.U. Rehman, Translating stakeholders’ pressure into environmental practices – The mediating role of knowledge management, J. Clean. Prod. 275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124163.
[72]       J. Zhai, X. Xu, J. Xu, X. Lyu, Research on Green Collaborative Innovation Mechanism of Cloud Manufacturing Enterprises under Government Supervision, Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8820791.
[73]       N. Corrocher, I. Solito, How do firms capture value from environmental innovations ? An empirical analysis on European SMEs, Ind. Innov. 2716 (2017) 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1302792.
[74]       A.H.E. Game-theoretic, Technology in Society A Hybrid Evolutionary Game-Theoretic and System Dynamics Approach for Analysis of Implementation Strategies of Green Technological Innovation under Government Intervention, (n.d.).
[75]       Q. Guoyou, Z. Saixing, T. Chiming, Y. Haitao, Z. Hailiang, Stakeholders’ Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 20 (2013) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.283.
[76]       Shubham, P. Charan, L.S. Murty, Secondary stakeholder pressures and organizational adoption of sustainable operations practices: The mediating role of primary stakeholders, Bus. Strateg. Environ. 27 (2018) 910–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2041.
[77]       J.W. Lee, Y.M. Kim, Y.E. Kim, Antecedents of Adopting Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Green Practices, J. Bus. Ethics 148 (2018) 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3024-y.
[78]       R. Kattel, J. Mazzucato, Mariana Algers, O. Mikheeva, The Green Giant: New Industrial Strategy for Norway. IIPP policy report (PR 21/01), (2021).
[79]       J.S. Lim, K.M. Shin, J.S. Yoon, S.H. Bae, Study of US/EU National Innovation Policies Based on Nanotechnology Development, and Implications for Korea, J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 3 (2015) 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1633/jistap.2015.3.1.4.
[80]       Z. Liang, J. Chen, D. Jiang, Y. Sun, Assessment of the spatial association network of green innovation: Role of energy resources in green recovery, Resour. Policy 79 (2022) 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103072.
[81]       T. Gutmann, Harmonizing corporate venturing modes: an integrative review and research agenda, Manag. Rev. Q. 69 (2019) 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-018-0148-4.
[82]       S. Bhatt, Entrepreneurship Today: The Resurgence of Small, Technology-Driven Businesses in a Dynamic New Economy, Entrep. Today Resurgence Small, Technol. Businesses a Dyn. New Econ. (2022) 1–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11495-3.
[83]       H. Zarei, M. Rasti-Barzoki, I. Moon, A Game Theoretic Approach to the Selection, Mentorship, and Investment Decisions of Start-Up Accelerators, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 69 (2022) 1753–1768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2974532.
[84]       A. Moritz, T. Naulin, E. Lutz, Accelerators as drivers of coopetition among early-stage startups, Technovation 111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102378.
[85]       A. Laspia, G. Sansone, P. Landoni, D. Racanelli, E. Bartezzaghi, The organization of innovation services in science and technology parks: Evidence from a multi-case study analysis in Europe, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121095.
[86]       I. Drori, M. Wright, Accelerators: Characteristics, trends and the new entrepreneurial ecosystem, Accel. Success. Ventur. Creat. Growth (2018) 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434098.00005.
[87]       A. Sreenivasan, M. Suresh, Green Start-ups: Start-ups Accelerating Sustainability, Int. J. Glob. Bus. Compet. 18 (2023) 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-022-00068-6.
[88]       S.N. Kaplan, P. Strömberg, Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts, Rev. Econ. Stud. 70 (2003) 281–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00245.
System Engineering and Productivity
Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 8
Serial No. 8, Autumn Quarterly
Autumn 2023
Pages 135-164

  • Receive Date 06 October 2022
  • Revise Date 05 July 2023
  • Accept Date 17 October 2023
  • First Publish Date 19 December 2023
  • Publish Date 19 December 2023