System Engineering and Productivity

System Engineering and Productivity

Performance Evaluation of Methanol Producing Petrochemical Companies Using Data Envelopment Analysis Based on Natural and Managerial Principles

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Corresponding author: Ph.D. Student, Department of Financial Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 M.Sc., Department of Business Administration, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the performance of petrochemical companies producing methanol using data envelopment analysis based on the simultaneous use of two natural and managerial principles. Because, in DEA, natural accessibility shows the potential capacity for improvement based on the mathematical frontier of efficiency, while managerial accessibility focuses on the possibility of actually realizing these improvements. The combination of these two perspectives reveals the gap between theoretical and practical efficiency and provides a basis for designing realistic performance improvement programs. For this purpose, a statistical population consisting of four petrochemical companies producing methanol active in the country has been selected. The research period for data analysis is related to the year 1401. The results obtained showed that the best and highest efficiency is related to Fanavaran, Zagros and Khark companies with a relative efficiency of 100 percent, and the Marjan production unit has been determined as an inefficient unit. In addition, it has been prioritized using the Anderson-Peterson method. Based on the priority obtained, Khark Company ranked first, Zagros Company ranked second, Fanavaran Company ranked third, and Marjan Company ranked fourth. Also, a comparison based on efficiency scores with basic models including BCC and CCR is presented to examine the capability of the proposed model. The difference in inefficiency between the proposed method and the BCC method is minor and is at the level of 0.012. Finally, the changes in the amount of manageable input have been calculated, in which case the maximum amount of reduction in the number of manageable inputs is calculated to be 0.141 units. The results of this study allow managers of petrochemical companies producing methanol to identify inefficient units with potential for improvement and direct organizational resources to them in a targeted manner. Also, by combining natural and managerial perspectives, managers can formulate realistic operational plans to improve productivity, optimize production capacity, and manage assets, and implement corrective actions with specific prioritization and timing.

Highlights

  • Investigating the efficiency of the performance of units using the DEA method
  • Applying the principles of natural and managerial accessibility simultaneously in the development of the DEA model
  • Ranking the efficiency of units using the Anderson-Peterson method

Keywords
Subjects

Copyright © Mahdi Sadeghi Moghaddam, Mohammad Khazraei

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Alavi, S., Janatyan, N., & Zeinalnezhad, M. (2024). Benchmarking of fifteen urban services units of Isfahan Municipality by using aggressive data envelopment analysis. System Engineering and Productivity, 4(3), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2040865.1227
Amirteimoori, A., Allahviranloo, T., Kordrostami, S., & Bagheri, S. F. (2024). Improving decision-making units in performance analysis methods: a data envelopment analysis approach. Mathematical Sciences18(3), 451-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-023-00512-5
Arana-Jiménez, M., Sánchez-Gil, M. C., Younesi, A., & Lozano, S. (2021). Integer interval DEA: An axiomatic derivation of the technology and an additive, slacks-based model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 422, 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2020.12.011
Asadi, F., Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Bazrafshan, M. (2023). Inverse data envelopment analysis without convexity: Double frontiers. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 46(1), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-022-00377-8
Avazpoor, M., Zarei, J., & Alinezhad, E. (2025). Evaluation and prioritization of electricity generation technologies in Iran using a multi-criteria decision-making approach. System Engineering and Productivity. 5(3), 179-198.  https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2063697.1333
Bahiraie, A., Hamedi, R., Alinia, H., & Sanayei, Y. (2020). Modeling the efficiency of banks by cover data method and genetic programming. Journal of Modeling in Engineering, 9(31), 69–98 (In Persian).
Choe, C., Byun, M., Lee, H., & Lim, H. (2022). Techno-economic and environmental assessments for sustainable bio-methanol production as landfill gas valorization. Waste Management150, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.040
Fakhr Mousavi, S. M., Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2023). Non-radial two-stage network DEA model to estimate returns to scale. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(1), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-09-2020-0228
Farashah, V. H., Hosseini, S. H., Sazvar, Z., & Ganjavi, H. S. (2020). An investigation on the petrochemical industry development in Iran: A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, 16(5–6), 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2020.109312
Fasihi, M., Efimova, O., & Breyer, C. (2019). Techno-economic assessment of CO2 direct air capture plants. Journal of Cleaner Production224, 957-980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086
Garavand, S., Mehregan, N., Sadegh, H., & Malekshahi, M. (2013). Energy efficiency analysis in the petrochemical industry of Iran. The Journal of Economic Policy, 5(10), 57–74 (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453967.1392.5.10.2.3
Ghafori, K. (2023). Investigating financial efficiency in steel industry companies: Evidence from three-dimensional DEA approach. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 8(4), 832–843 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2022.361244.1663
Ghasemi, M., & Ghiasi, M. (2025). Evaluating and predicting technology development in smartwatches using TFDEA. System Engineering and Productivity, 4(4), 1–12 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2024.2023670.1188
Gholamian, S. A. (2025). Evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers by providing a decision support system based on a new data envelopment analysis model and cumulative star utility. System Engineering and Productivity, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2025845.1198
Hosseini, S. S., & Ehtiyati, E. (2006). Competitive advantage and its measurement: A case study of Iran’s methanol products. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 8(28), 169–193 (In Persian).
Keyvani Shahri, F. S., Kaveh, D., Karimi, M., & Zendehdel, A. (2024). Identifying the dimensions and components of entrepreneurship with a social responsibility approach in the General Directorate of Education. System Engineering and Productivity, 4(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2032004.1216
Khodaparast Pirsaraei, Y. (2021). Declining profitability of Iran’s methanol industry: Causes, factors and consequences of its energy security. Economic Security, 102, 75–86 (In Persian).
Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Noveiri, M. J. S. (2019). Inputs and outputs classification in integer-valued data envelopment analysis. Measurement139, 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.087
Mahboubi, M., Kordrostami, S., Amirteimoori, A., & Ghane-Kanafi, A. (2022). Undesirable factors and marginal rates of substitution in data envelopment analysis. Mathematical Sciences, 16(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-021-00389-2
Mehrgan, M. R., Safari, H., & Asgharizadeh, E. (2010). Measuring Competitiveness of Methanol through Fuzzy System. Journal of Business management2(1) (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20085907.1389.2.1.10.2
Mobbarezi, H., Hosseinzadeh, A., & Ghasemi Namaghi, M. (2020). Model of strategic marketing alliance of methanol producing petrochemical companies in Iran. Political Sociology of Iran, 3(1), (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.321955.2868
Mousaei, A., Firoozeh, M., & Hatefi, M. A. (2021). Formation of methanol industrial cluster based on market elasticity. Quarterly Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 19(46), 45–62 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jtd.2021.249020
Noveiri, M. J. S., Kordrostami, S., & Amirteimoori, A. (2022). Performance analysis of sustainable supply networks with bounded, discrete, and joint factors. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 238–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01415-y
Pashapour, S., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., & Keramati, A. (2019). Performance optimization of organizations considering economic resilience factors under uncertainty: A case study of a petrochemical plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1526–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.171
Pouri, K. (2025). Designing a bi-objective mathematical model for cost and environmental pollution control in circular supply chain management for petrochemical product production. System Engineering and Productivity. https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2060799.1321
Moioli, E., & Schildhauer, T. (2022). Eco-techno-economic analysis of methanol production from biogas and power-to-X. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research61(21), 7335-7348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04682
Sepehrian, Z., Khoshfetrat, S., & Ebadi, S. (2022). Weight Derivation in Analytic Hierarchy Process Using Based on Double-Frontier Analysis. Journal of Operational Research In Its Applications (Applied Mathematics)-Lahijan Azad University19(2), 93-111. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22517286.2022.19.2.4.6
Soltanifar, M. (2024). Evaluation of hospitals and health care centers with ratio data. In Decision Making in Healthcare Systems (pp. 29-47). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46735-6_4
Soufi, M. (2024). Multiple Attribute Decision Making in Ranking the Criteria in Health (with Certain and Uncertain Data). In Decision Making in Healthcare Systems (pp. 49-128). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46735-6_5
Tayebi Abolhasani, A., & Koosha, H. (2016). Performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis and TOPSIS (Case: Mashhad Municipality’s Youth Consultants Group). Organizational Culture Management, 14(3), 909–936 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jomc.2016.58895
Vaezi, E. (2023). Measuring an efficiency aggregation of medical diagnostic laboratories: A window NDEA approach. Medical Imaging Process & Technology6(1). https://doi.org/10.24294/mipt.v6i1.3138
Vaezi, E., Najafi, S. E., Haji Molana, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Ahadzadeh Namin, M. (2020). Efficiency evaluation in hybrid three-stage network data envelopment analysis from the double-frontier standpoint. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 7(3), 222–241. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/IJSOM.2020.3.2
Valera, H., & Agarwal, A. K. (2018). Methanol as an alternative fuel for diesel engines. In Methanol and the alternate fuel economy (pp. 9–33). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3287-6_2
Yeganeh, S. (2025). Performance evaluation of organizational innovation creation system by network data envelopment analysis with random input and output. System Engineering and Productivity, 4(4), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2031849.1214

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 September 2025

  • Receive Date 20 August 2025
  • Revise Date 14 September 2025
  • Accept Date 26 September 2025
  • First Publish Date 26 September 2025
  • Publish Date 26 September 2025