مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

ارزیابی فناوری تصفیه آب در صنایع آب‌بر تحت استراتژی تجارت انتشار کربن دولت: یک رویکرد نظریه بازی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
محمدباقر جمالی 1
محمدعلی اقبالی 2
1 نویسنده مسئول: استادیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی کامپیوتر و صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
10.22034/sep.2025.2049011.1245
چکیده
صنایع آب‌بر مانند فولاد، با ردپای کربنی قابل‌توجه در مراحل تولید و فرآیندهای تصفیه آب، سهم عمده‌ای در آلودگی محیط‌زیست دارند. این مسأله باعث شده تا دولت‌ها به تدوین سیاست‌ها و سازوکارهایی برای کاهش انتشار کربن در این صنایع بپردازند. یکی از این سیاست‌ها، تجارت کربن است؛ مکانیسمی که در آن به هر شرکت سهمیه مشخصی از انتشار کربن اختصاص داده می‌شود. شرکت‌هایی که از این سهمیه فراتر روند، با پرداخت جریمه مواجه می‌شوند و آن‌هایی که میزان انتشار کمتری دارند، می‌توانند سهمیه اضافی خود را به دیگران بفروشند. در مقاله حاضر، از یک مدل بازی استکلبرگ استفاده شده است که در آن دولت به‌عنوان بازیکن رهبر و تولیدکنندگان به‌عنوان بازیکنان پیرو نقش‌آفرینی می‌کنند. با به‌کارگیری نظریه بازی، اثرات یارانه‌های دولتی بر مقادیر تعادلی متغیرهای تصمیم شامل میزان تولید، انتشار کربن، و هزینه‌ها بررسی‌شده است. نتایج این تحلیل می‌تواند به دولت‌ها و تولیدکنندگان در تدوین سیاست‌های مؤثر برای کاهش ردپای کربنی و بهبود عملکرد زیست‌محیطی صنایع کمک کند. این پژوهش با ارائه بینش‌های کاربردی    در زمینه تعاملات اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی، نقش مهمی در درک تأثیر سیاست‌های دولتی بر تصمیم‌گیری در صنایع آب‌بر ایفا می‌کند.

تازه های تحقیق

  • بررسی اثرات یارانه‌ دولتی بر مقادیر تعادلی متغیرهای تصمیم شامل میزان تولید، انتشار کربن و هزینه‌ها.
  • بررسی سیاست‌های مؤثر برای کاهش ردپای کربن و بهبود عملکرد زیست‌محیطی صنایع.
  • تحلیل تصمیم‌گیری صنایع آب‌بر تحت تأثیر مداخله دولتی.

کلیدواژه‌ها
تجارت کربن
صنایع آب بر
آلودگی محیط زیست
مدل استکلبرگ
نظریه بازی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of Water Treatment Technologies in Water-Intensive Industries Under Cap-and-Trade Strategy: A Game-Theoretic Approach

نویسندگان English

Mohammad-Bagher Jamali 1
Mohammad-Ali Eghbali 2
1 Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Computer and Industrial Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran
چکیده English

Water-intensive industries such as steel production, with a significant carbon footprint in both production stages and water treatment processes, play a major role in environmental pollution. This issue has prompted governments to develop policies and mechanisms aimed at reducing carbon emissions in these industries. One such policy is carbon trading—a mechanism in which each company is allocated a specific carbon emission quota. Companies that exceed this quota face penalties, while those with lower emissions can sell their surplus quotas to others. This study employs a Stackelberg game model, where the government acts as the leader and producers as the followers. Using game theory, the effects of government subsidies on the equilibrium values of decision variables, including production levels, carbon emissions, and costs, are analyzed. The results of this analysis provide valuable insights for governments and producers in formulating effective policies to reduce the carbon footprint and improve the environmental performance of industries. By offering practical insights into economic and environmental interactions, this research plays a crucial role in understanding the impact of governmental policies on decision-making in water-intensive industries.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Carbon trading
Water-intensive industries
Environmental pollution
Stackelberg model
Game theory

Copyright © Mohammad-Bagher Jamali, Mohammad-Ali Eghbali

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Aghaie, V., Alizadeh, H., & Afshar, A. (2020). Emergence of social norms in the cap-and-trade policy: An agent-based groundwater market. Journal of Hydrology, 588, 125057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125057
Ali, S., Badar, M. S., Nikkhah, A., Fen, C. S., Nouri, A., Mohammad, A. W., Lun, A. W., Nourigheimasi, F., Ng, L. Y., & Mahmoudi, E. (2024). Progress in nanomaterial-driven redox reactions for water purification: A critical review. Desalination and Water Treatment, 319, 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100616
Almonti, D., Baiocco, G., & Ucciardello, N. (2021). Pulp and paper characterization by means of artificial neural networks for effluent solid waste minimization—A case study. Journal of Process Control, 105, 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.08.012
Badar, M. S., Ali, S., Daniyal, Akram, M. W., Faheem, K., Khan, S. U., & Farooqi, I. H. (2024). GIS-based assessment of groundwater vulnerability to heavy metal contamination via water quality pollution indices in urban Aligarh, India. Water Practice & Technology, 19(2), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.019
Burdack, D., Biewald, A., & Lotze-Campen, H. (2014). Cap-and-trade of water rights: A sustainable way out of Australia’s rural water problems? GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23(4), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.23.4.7
Cao, E., Du, L., & Ruan, J. (2019). Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain: Supplier vs. bank. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.001
Chen, Z., Fang, L., & Wang, H. (2019). Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0006-7
Ding, H., Zhao, Q., An, Z., & Tang, O. (2016). Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.004
Giarola, S., Shah, N., & Bezzo, F. (2012). A comprehensive approach to the design of ethanol supply chains including carbon trading effects. Bioresource Technology, 107, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.090
He, L., Gu, Q., Bian, J., Lai, K. K., & Zhang, X. (2023). To pool or not to pool in carbon quotas: Analyses of emission regulation and operations in supply chain supernetwork under cap-and-trade policy. Annals of Operations Research, 324(1–2), 311–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04724-1
Jamali, M.-B., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2022). A game-theoretic approach for examining government support strategies and licensing contracts in an electricity supply chain with technology spillover: A case study of Iran. Energy, 242, 122919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122919
Kamyab, M., & Abbasian, M. (2024). A review of effective nanofluid solutions for improving and optimizing water and wastewater treatment processes. Journal of Science and Engineering Elites, 46(9), 1–15. (In Persian)
Karkou, E., Teo, C. J., Savvakis, N., Poinapen, J., & Arampatzis, G. (2024). Industrial circular water use practices through the application of a conceptual water efficiency framework in the process industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122596
Kumar, A., & Thakur, A. (2024). Industrial water conservation by water footprint and Sustainable Development Goals. In Current directions in water scarcity research (Vol. 8, pp. 87–117). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-23631-0.00007-8
Li, B., Zhu, M., Jiang, Y., & Li, Z. (2016). Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2029–2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.017
Mao, Z., Zhang, S., & Li, X. (2017). Low carbon supply chain firm integration and firm performance in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.081
Mohammad Behrouzi Nejad, M. H. K., Sadi, S., & Shahsavan, A. (2024). Improving efficiency in municipal wastewater treatment based on advanced variable pore microfiltration systems. Water and Energy Engineering, 2(3), 1–20. (In Persian)
Norang, A., Eghbali, M. A., & Hajian, A. (2010, January). Supply chain analysis model based on system dynamics approach: A case of Iranian bicycle manufacturer. In 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management (ICLSIM) (Vol. 3, pp. 1481–1485). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461214
Safarzadeh, S., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2019). A game theoretic approach for assessing residential energy-efficiency program considering rebound, consumer behavior, and government policies. Applied Energy, 233–234, 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.032
Shi, B., Li, N., Gao, Q., & Li, G. (2022). Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China’s carbon trading pilot policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 319, 115650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650
Shokufeh Pira, S. N., & Asadi, A. (2022). An overview of recent achievements in the fabrication and modification of microfiltration antifouling membranes for water treatment. Water and Wastewater Journal, 33(4), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2022.334359.3246
Sinayi, M., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2018). A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1443–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.212
Stankov, S. (2024). Prečišćavanje vode u procesnoj industriji. Zbornik Međunarodnog kongresa o procesnoj industriji–Procesing, 37(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.24094/ptk.024.121
Sun, D., Zhang, M., & Jung, D. (2023). Policy evaluation of economic–environmental tradeoffs in regulating industrial water use: An agent-based model. Journal of Environmental Management, 346, 118988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118988
Sun, H., Yang, J., & Zhong, Y. (2020). Optimal decisions for two risk-averse competitive manufacturers under the cap-and-trade policy and uncertain demand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031010
Waheed, R., Sarwar, S., & Wei, C. (2019). The survey of economic growth, energy consumption and carbon emission. Energy Reports, 5, 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.07.006
Wang, Z., & Wang, C. (2015). How carbon offsetting scheme impacts the duopoly output in production and abatement: Analysis in the context of carbon cap-and-trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.069
Xu, X., He, P., Xu, H., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.029
Yang, L., Zhang, Q., & Ji, J. (2017). Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.021
Yu-Jie, J., Jiang, K.-J., Sha, C., Xiang, P.-P., & Chen-Min, H. (2024). Water use in the industrial sector based on the IPAC model under the carbon-neutral transformation path in China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 15(5), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2024.11.004
Zhang, B., & Xu, L. (2013). Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024
Zhou, Y., Bao, M., Chen, X., & Xu, X. (2016). Co-op advertising and emission reduction cost sharing contracts and coordination in low-carbon supply chain based on fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.097
Zhou, Y., Han, J., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Synergizing carbon trading and water management for urban sustainability: A city-level multi-objective planning framework. Applied Energy, 359, 122637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122637

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 دی 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 29 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 شهریور 1404