مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی پشتیبانی مدیریت دانش از خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی: روندها، شکاف‌ها و جهت‌گیری‌های آینده

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران
2 نویسنده مسئول: دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(ع)، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، دانشکده مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی، دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران
چکیده
خط‌مشی‌گذاری آگاه از دانش به‌عنوان رویکردی نوین در حکمرانی مدرن بر استفاده از شواهد علمی، داده‌های تجربی و پژوهش‌ها برای تصمیم‌سازی عمومی تأکید دارد. باوجود ظرفیت بالای این رویکرد در افزایش اثربخشی و مشروعیت خط‌مشی‌ها، موانعی همچون دسترسی محدود به داده‌ها، دشواری در تفسیر و ترجمه دانش همچنان چالش‌زا هستند. هدف این پژوهش، ارائه تحلیلی کتاب‌سنجی از ادبیات علمی خط‌مشی‌گذاری آگاه از دانش برای شناسایی روندها، شکاف‌ها و مسیرهای آینده است. داده‌ها از پایگاه‌های وب‌آف ساینس و اسکوپوس استخراج و 317 سند منتشرشده بین سال‌های 1997 تا 2025 بررسی شد. روش‌های تحلیل شامل ارزیابی عملکرد، تحلیل استنادی، همکاری علمی و نقشه‌برداری علمی (هم‌استنادی و هم‌کلمه) بود. یافته‌ها نشان دادند این حوزه با نرخ رشد سالانه 61/6% درحال‌توسعه است و کشورهایی مانند انگلستان، استرالیا، کانادا، آمریکا و هلند بیشترین نقش را دارند. مجلات، نویسندگان و آثار کلیدی شناسایی و ساختار فکری حوزه ترسیم شد. همچنین، روندهای نوظهوری چون به‌کارگیری کلان‌داده و هوش مصنوعی در خط‌مشی‌گذاری و نقش فزاینده مشارکت عمومی برجسته گردید. این پژوهش با ارائه تصویری جامع از وضعیت موجود، بر ضرورت پرکردن شکاف میان پژوهش و خط‌مشی، افزایش دسترسی به داده‌ها و گسترش همکاری بین‌المللی تأکید می‌کند. نتایج برای پژوهشگران و خط‌مشی‌گذاران، بینش‌های ارزشمندی جهت تقویت رویکردهای مبتنی بر دانش فراهم می‌سازد و به‌عنوان یکی از نخستین مطالعات کتاب‌سنجی جامع این حوزه، مرجع معتبری برای تحقیقات آینده محسوب می‌شود.

تازه های تحقیق

  • داده‌های 317 مقاله از پایگاه‌های اسکوپوس و وب‌آف ساینس طی سال‌های 1997 تا 2025 بررسی شده‌اند.
  • نرخ رشد سالانه این حوزه 61/6% است و انگلستان، استرالیا و کانادا پیشتاز پژوهش‌اند.
  • یافته‌ها شکاف‌های دانشی و فرصت‌های همکاری علمی برای بهبود خط‌مشی گذاری را آشکار می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Bibliometric Analysis of Knowledge Management Support for Public Policymaking: Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Hossein Shadmanfar 1
Rouhollah Tavallaei 2
Abed Rezaei 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Management , Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
2 Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge Management, Faculty of Management, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Knowledge-based policymaking is an emerging approach in modern governance that emphasizes the use of scientific evidence, empirical data, and research to inform public decision-making. This approach has considerable potential to enhance the effectiveness and legitimacy of policies. However, barriers such as limited access to data, difficulties in interpreting and translating knowledge, and the gap between research and practice remain major challenges. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on knowledge-based policymaking to identify key trends, research gaps, and future directions. Data were collected from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, covering 317 publications published between 1997 and 2025. The analysis involved performance evaluation, citation and co-citation analysis, scientific collaboration assessment, and co-word mapping to explore intellectual structures and thematic developments. The findings reveal that this field is growing at an annual rate of 6.61%, with countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands playing leading roles. Influential journals, authors, and works were identified, and the intellectual foundations of the field were mapped. Emerging trends include the use of big data and artificial intelligence in policymaking, along with the growing role of public participation. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the field, emphasizing the need to improve data accessibility, strengthen the link between research and policy, and expand international collaboration. The results offer valuable insights for researchers and policymakers and serve as a solid bibliometric reference for future research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Policymaking
Knowledge management
Knowledge translation
Governance and scientific evidence
Bibliometric analysis

Copyright © Mohammad Hossein Shadmanfar, Rouhollah Tavallae, Abed Rezaei

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Adigwe, I. (2016). Lotka’s law and productivity patterns of authors in biomedical science in Nigeria on HIV/AIDS: A bibliometric approach. The Electronic Library, 34(5), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2014-0024
Andersen, N. A., & Smith, K. (2022). Evidence-based policy-making. De Gruyter Handbook of Contemporary Welfare States, Berlin: De Gruyter, 29-44.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C., D’Aniello, L., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2022). Thematic analysis as a new culturomic tool: The social media coverage on COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Sustainability, 14(6), 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063643
Cairney, P. (2021). Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. In Practical lessons from policy theories (pp. 13-34). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447359852.ch002
Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2017). Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
Callon, M., Courtial, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press.
Castriotta, M., Loi, M., Marku, E., & Moi, L. (2021). Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: Conceptualizing through co-words. Scientometrics, 126(4), 2821–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03846-2
Cherney, A., & Head, B. (2010). Evidence-based policy and practice: Key challenges for improvement. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(4), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2010.tb00195.x
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Cobo, M. J., Martínez, M. A., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at knowledge-based systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035
Cole, S., Dhaliwal, I., Sautmann, A., & Vilhuber, L. (2020). Using administrative data for research and evidence-based policy: An introduction. In Handbook on using administrative data for research and evidence-based policy. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
Davies, H. T., & Nutley, S. M. (1999). The rise and rise of evidence in health care. Public Money & Management, 19(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00147
Davies, H. T., & Nutley, S. M. (Eds.). (2000). What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Policy Press.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Donthu, N., Reinartz, W., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2021). A retrospective review of the first 35 years of the International Journal of Research in Marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 232–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.006
Fusco, F., Marsilio, M., & Guglielmetti, C. (2020). Co-production in health policy and management: A comprehensive bibliometric review. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), Article 504. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05241-2
Guyatt, G., Cairns, J., Churchill, D., Cook, D., Haynes, B., Hirsh, J., Irvine, J., Levine, M., Levine, M., Nishikawa, J., Sackett, D., Brill-Edwards, P., Gerstein, H., Gibson, J., Jaeschke, R., Kerigan, A., Neville, A., Panju, A., Detsky, A., … Tugwell, P. (1992). Evidence-based medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA, 268(17), 2420–2425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
Hart, N., & Saul, J. (2023). Evidence 2.0: The next era of evidence-based policymaking. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://doi.org/10.48558/YH1W-C158
Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more evidence-informed policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12475
Hjørland, B. (2013). Facet analysis: The logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49(2), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001
Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
Kamaneh, S. F., Zamahani, M., & Daraei, M. R. (2025). Designing and elucidating a data governance model in smart government organizations with an emphasis on information and media management in IDRO. System Engineering and Productivity, e728901. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2069504.1384
Koskina, A., Georgantas, E., & Plionis, M. (2024). Climate crisis and human migration: The emergent sociolegal parameters of a science-based policymaking. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1468711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1468711
Lauterbach, K. W. (2023). Evidence-based policy-making—Epidemiology as a key science for quality of life in society. European Journal of Epidemiology, 38(12), 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-023-01056-7
Lazarides, M. K., Lazaridou, I. Z., & Papanas, N. (2025). Bibliometric analysis: bridging informatics with science. The international journal of lower extremity wounds24(3), 515-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231153538
Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y
López-Fernández, M. C., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship and family firm research: A bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 622–639.
Mbachu, C., Agwu, P., Obi, F., & Onwujekwe, O. (2024). Understanding and bridging gaps in the use of evidence from modeling for evidence-based policy making in Nigeria’s health system. MDM Policy & Practice, 9(1), 23814683231225658. https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231225658
McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: Experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
Moghan, M., Mahmoodi, J., & Ghazizadeh Fard, S. Z. (2025). Governance in project-based organizations: A combined scientometrics and qualitative analysis of dimensions, components, and indicators. System Engineering and Productivity, 5(3), 87–133 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2059214.1316
Nagase, T., Rene, A. O. N., & Okuhara, K. (2023). Data fusion by web-GIS to open data for evidence-based policy making. International Conference of Information Commissioners, 14(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.24507/icicelb.14.05.475
Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B., & Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-008-9071-1
Oliver, K., Lorenc, T., & Innvær, S. (2014). New directions in evidence-based policy research: A critical analysis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, 12(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-34
Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up—Evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700304
Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Rasooly, A., Ben-Sheleg, E., Davidovitch, N., & Ellen, M. (2023). Rethinking the path from evidence to decision-making. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-023-00559-8
Raymaekers, P., Migchelbrink, K., Pattyn, V., & De Smedt, P. (2025). Organizational and individual factors of evidence-informed policy making in public organizations. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13946
Rossetto, D. E., Bernardes, R. C., Borini, F. M., & Gattaz, C. C. (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: Review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1329–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7
Rycroft-Malone, J., Seers, K., Titchen, A., Harvey, G., Kitson, A., & McCormack, B. (2004). What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03068.x
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
Sanderson, I. (2003). Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176846
Sanderson, I. (2006). Complexity, ‘practical rationality’ and evidence-based policy making. Policy & Politics, 34(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557306775212188
Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies, 57(4), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00791.x
Shaxson, L., Hood, R., Boaz, A., & Head, B. (2024). Negotiating the budget for evidence-informed policy-making: Insights from a UK government department. Public Money & Management, 44(6), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2308003
Shim, H., & Shin, K. (2021). Empirical analysis of evidence-based policymaking in R&D programmes. Sustainability, 14(1), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010311
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Talbot, R., Filtness, A., & Morris, A. (2024). Proposing a framework for evidence-based road safety policy-making: Connecting crash causation, countermeasures and policy. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 195, 107409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107409
Trujillo, C. M., & Long, T. M. (2018). Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research. Science Advances, 4(1), e1701130. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701130
Vartiainen, N., & Keinänen, A. (2024). Measuring the quality of law drafting: Did COVID-19 weaken evidence-based policy making in Finland? Statute Law Review, 45(1), hmae017. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmae017
Walker, R. M., Yeung, D. Y. L., Lee, M. J., & Lee, I. P. (2020). Assessing information-based policy tools: An eye-tracking laboratory experiment on public information posters. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(6), 558–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1753035
Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, co-citation networks, topical networks, co-authorship networks, and co-word networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22680
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 24 مهر 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 14 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 24 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 24 مهر 1404