مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

مدل‌سازی روابط بین عوامل مؤثر بر فرآیند توسعه خانواده محصول چابک (مطالعه موردی: شرکت سایپا)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
چکیده
در چشم‌انداز رقابتی امروز، شرکت‌های تولیدی با فشارهای فزاینده‌ای برای تأمین سریع نیازهای مشتریان، هم‌زمان با کاهش هزینه‌ها و کاهش چرخه عمر محصول مواجه هستند. در پاسخ استراتژیک به این وضعیت، مفهوم «توسعه خانواده محصول چابک» مطرح شده است تا به شرکت‌ها امکان دهد انواع مختلفی از محصولات مرتبط را که اجزای مشابهی دارند تولید کنند؛ بدین منظور که بتوانند بخش‌های مختلف بازار را سریع‌تر و پیش از رقبا جذب کنند. با این حال، کارآمدی این فرآیند معمولاً به‌دلیل عدم درک روابط علّی و معلولی بین عوامل مؤثر بر آن محدود شده است. این مطالعه با تمرکز بر صنعت خودروسازی و به‌ویژه شرکت خودروسازی ایرانی سایپا درصدد رفع این شکاف است. اولین هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت در فرآیند توسعه خانواده محصول بود و سپس، مدل‌سازی روابط علّی و معلولی بین این عوامل به‌منظور تدوین یک نقشه راه برای افزایش چابکی در توسعه خانواده محصول در بخش خودروسازی ایران. روش تحقیق، کاربردی بود و از روش توصیفی–پیمایشی در آن استفاده شد. با مرور ادبیات، ۲۹ عامل کلیدی در توسعه خانواده محصول چابک شناسایی شد که در پنج گروه اصلی طبقه‌بندی شدند. سپس، روش نگاشت مفهومی فازی برای مدل‌سازی روابط علّی و معلولی بین عوامل شناسایی‌شده، بر اساس پاسخ‌های گردآوری‌شده از پرسش‌نامه‌های توزیع‌شده بین ۱۶ نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان خبره شرکت سایپا به‌کار گرفته شد. مدل ارائه‌شده به مدیران پیشنهاد می‌کند که با تمرکز بر روابط علّی و معلولی موجود در مدل، بتوانند به نیازهای مشتریان، با حفظ کیفیت بالا، هزینه پایین و چرخه توسعه محصول کوتاه، پاسخ دهند.

تازه های تحقیق

  • بررسی ادبیات مربوط به توسعه خانواده محصول و چابکی 
  • شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه خانواده محصول چابک از طریق تحلیل آماری 
  • مدل‌سازی روابط علی و معلولی بین عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه محصول جدید چابک با استفاده از روش نگاشت مفهومی فازی در شرکت سایپا

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Modeling the Relationships Among Effective Factors of Agile Family Product Development: A Case Study of SAIPA Company

نویسندگان English

Hamidreza Amini 1
Roksana Fekri 2
Fahimeh Soltanian 3
1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

In today’s competitive landscape, manufacturing companies face increasing pressure to rapidly meet customer needs while simultaneously reducing costs and shortening product life cycles. As a strategic response to this situation, the concept of Agile Product Family Development has emerged, enabling companies to produce various related products that share common components, in order to capture different market segments more quickly and ahead of competitors. However, the effectiveness of this process is often constrained by a lack of understanding of the causal relationships among its influencing factors. This study seeks to bridge this gap by focusing on the automotive industry, and in particular the Iranian automaker SAIPA. The first objective of the research was to identify the critical success factors of the product family development process, and then to model the causal relationships among these factors in order to develop a roadmap for enhancing agility in product family development in the Iranian automotive sector. The research is applied in nature and employs a descriptive–survey method. Through a review of the literature, 29 key factors in agile product family development were identified and classified into five main groups. Subsequently, the fuzzy concept mapping method was used to model the causal relationships among the identified factors, based on responses collected from questionnaires distributed to 16 managers and expert specialists at SAIPA. The proposed model suggests that by focusing on the causal relationships embedded in the model, managers can respond to customer needs while maintaining high quality, low cost, and short product development cycles.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Product Family development process
Agility
The cause and effect model
Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM)
The SAIPA Auto Company

Copyright © Hamidreza Amini, Roksana Fekri, Fahimeh Soltanian

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Abdollahi, M., Ahmadvand, A. M., & Mirshahvelayati, F. (2025). Analysis of Key Trends in Iran's Steel Production Chain: A Systematic Exploration of Emerging Trends. System Engineering and Productivity5(3), 155-177 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2063146.1332
Aliverdilo, M., & Ahmadvand, A. M. (2023). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Implementation of Total Quality Management and its Impact on Customer Attraction (a Case Study in Tehran Railway Company). System Engineering and Productivity3(1), 41-65 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2023.706142
Altuwaijri, F. S., & Ferrario, M. A. (2022). Factors affecting Agile adoption: An industry research study of the mobile app sector in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Systems and Software190, 111347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111347
Asnaashari, A., Ghidarkhani, J. (2019). Studying and investigating the agile project management in new product development process. The 15th International Conference of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/839645
Butt, S. A., Misra, S., Anjum, M. W., & Hassan, S. A. (2021, January). Agile project development issues during COVID-19. In International conference on lean and agile software development (pp. 59-70). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67084-9_4
Fekri, R., Aliahmadi, A., & Fathian, M. (2009). Identifying the cause and effect factors of agile NPD process with fuzzy DEMATEL method: the case of Iranian companies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing20(6), 637-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0153-x
Heimicke, J., Kaiser, S., & Albers, A. (2021). Agile product development: an analysis of acceptance and added value in practice. Procedia CIRP100, 768-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.046
Humpert, L., Röhm, B., Anacker, H., Dumitrescu, R., & Anderl, R. (2022). Method for direct end customer integration into the agile product development. Procedia Cirp109, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.239
Jiao, J., Simpson, T. W., & Siddique, Z. (2007). Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of intelligent Manufacturing18(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2
Kelbel, H. C., Stoecker, L., Frank, J. J., Lukas, G., Bergweiler, G., Gries, T., ... & Schuh, G. (2022). Applicability of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies for Agile Product Development in the Internet of Production: A Strategic Framework. Journal of Production Systems and Logistics. https://doi.org/10.15488/11958
Kordbacheh, M., Fekri, R., & Esmaeilian, G. (2022). Presenting a model for determining and discovering the causal relationships between the effective risks of the product family developing process in the Iranian automotive industry. Journal of Modeling in Engineering20(68), 15-34 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22075/jme.2021.23623.2103
Kordbacheh, M., Roksana, F., & Esmaeilian, G. (2023). Providing a causal model of risk management in the product family development process by grounded theory and structural equation modeling: Case study, The Iranian automotive industry. Journal of Improvement Management17(1), 137-162 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jmi.2023.385268.2914
Okhravi, A., & Rafizadeh, Z. (2025). Identifying and prioritizing enablers and effective capabilities in the agility of the fourth generation of universities. System Engineering and Productivity5(3), 23-44 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2053769.1269)
Pakseresht, M., Mahdavi, I., Shirazi, B., & Mahdavi-Amiri, N. (2020). Co-reconfiguration of product family and supply chain using leader–follower Stackelberg game theory: Bi-level multi-objective optimization. Applied Soft Computing91, 106203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106203
Raatikainen, M., Rautiainen, K., Myllärniemi, V., & Männistö, T. (2008, May). Integrating product family modeling with development management in agile methods. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Software development governance (pp. 17-20). https://doi.org/10.1145/1370720.1370728
Raatikainen, M., Rautiainen, K., Myllärniemi, V., & Männistö, T. (2008, May). Integrating product family modeling with development management in agile methods. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Software development governance (pp. 17-20). https://doi.org/10.1145/1370720.1370728
Rashidi, M., Banihashemi, S. A., & Seydi, A. (2025a). Investigating the Role of Employee's Communication Skills in Human Capital Agility by Mediating the Organizational Decision-making Process. System Engineering and Productivity5(3), 135-153 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2062408.1328
Rashidi, M., Divani, K., & Banihashemi, S. A. (2025b). Validation of a Model for Improving Employees' Innovative Work Behavior Based on Responsible Leadership and Person-Organization Fit. System Engineering and Productivity, e731287 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2072933.1400
Riesener, M., Doelle, C., Perau, S., Lossie, P., & Schuh, G. (2021). Methodology for iterative system modeling in agile product development. Procedia Cirp100, 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.101
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. L. (2007). Modelling IT projects success with fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert systems with applications32(2), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.032
Sankowski, O., Küchenhof, J., Dambietz, F. M., Züfle, M., Wallisch, A., Krause, D., & Paetzold, K. (2021). Challenges in early phase of product family development processes. Procedia CIRP100, 840-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.034
Schneider, M., Shnaider, E., Kandel, A., & Chew, G. (1998). Automatic construction of FCMs. Fuzzy Sets and Systems93(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00218-7
Varl, M., Duhovnik, J., & Tavčar, J. (2020). Agile product development process transformation to support advanced one-of-a-kind manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing33(6), 590-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1775301
Vinodh, S., Selvaraj, T., & Praveen, T. (2012). Design and development of agile product development cycle for rotary switches. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology10(3), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/17260531211274738
Wang, L., Jin, J. L., Zhou, K. Z., Li, C. B., & Yin, E. (2020). Does customer participation hurt new product development performance? Customer role, product newness, and conflict. Journal of Business Research109, 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.013

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 22 اردیبهشت 1405

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 22 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 22 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 22 اردیبهشت 1405