مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

مهندسی سیستم و بهره‌وری

ارزیابی چندمعیاره عملکرد مدیران بر پایه رهبری پایدار با به کارگیری رویکرد OPLO-POCOD

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 نویسنده مسئول: استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
در دنیای امروز، با توجه به افزایش نوآوری‌ها، پیچیدگی‌های محیطی و سطح بالای عدم قطعیت در سازمان‌ها و جوامع، رویکردهای سنتی رهبری پاسخگوی چالش‌های معاصر نبوده و مفاهیم نوینی همچون «رهبری پایدار» در حال توسعه است. این رویکرد بر تعادل میان ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی تمرکز کرده و هدف آن ارتقای تاب‌آوری، مسئولیت‌پذیری و توسعه پایدار است. در این مطالعه، روش نوآورانه فاصله مختصات قطبی بر اساس فرصت‌های از دست رفته در حوزه تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره برای تحلیل و ارزیابی هجده تا از بهترین شرکت‌های بازرگانی در شرایط عدم قطعیت مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. از مزایای این تکنیک، ضمن برخورداری از منطق قوی فرصت از دست رفته و اعتبارسنجی آن نسبت به سایر تکنیک‌ها، این است که می‌تواند به‌سادگی ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی گزینه‌ها را انجام دهد. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که شرکت A2 با کمترین مقدار فرصت از دست رفته (DOL= 0.0199) در رتبه اول و شرکت A11 با بیشترین فرصت از دست رفته (DOL = 0.0808) در رتبه آخر در راستای رهبری پایدار قرار گرفته است. همچنین معیارهایی مانند سودآوری پایدار، سلامت و ایمنی کاری و مدیریت پسماندها، با کمترین فرصت از دست رفته و بیشترین عملکرد در رتبه‌های برتر جهت ارزیابی مدیران شرکت و عملکرد پایدار آن‌ها قرار دارند، در حالی که معیارهایی مانند رقابت‌پذیری در بازارها و حفظ منابع طبیعی نیازمند اصلاحات استراتژیک و بهبود عملکرد هستند. این تکنیک با ترکیب فرصت از دست رفته و استفاده از رویکرد فاصله در مختصات قطبی، دیدگاه منحصربه‌فردی را در ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی فراهم می‌کند؛ به طوری که فاصله کمتر نشان‌دهنده فرصت از دست رفته کمتر است. این موضوع، درک و مقایسه گزینه‌ها را برای تصمیم‌گیرندگان و مدیران آسان‌تر می‌کند و منجر به تصمیم‌گیری دقیق‌تر و مؤثرتر در حوزه‌های مختلف می‌شود.

تازه های تحقیق

  • معرفی رویکرد نوآورانه OPLO-POCOD در ارزیابی رهبری پایدار سازمان‌ها
  • تحلیل عملکرد مدیران شرکت‌های بازرگانی در شرایط عدم‌قطعیت برای تقویت توسعه پایدار.
  • استفاده از معیار فرصت‌های از دست رفته برای رتبه‌بندی و بهبود استراتژیک در مدیران سازمان‌ها
  • اهمیت معیارهای پایداری مانند سودآوری و سلامت کاری در ارزیابی مدیران

کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Multi-criteria Evaluation of Managers' Performance Based on Sustainable Leadership Using the OPLO-POCOD Approach

نویسندگان English

Azadeh Ashrafi 1
Hossein Sheikh 2
Ali Avar 2
1 Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Public Management, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

In today's world, with the rapid increase in innovations, environmental complexities, and high levels of uncertainty in organizations and societies, traditional leadership approaches are no longer adequate for contemporary challenges, and new concepts such as "sustainable leadership" are developing. This approach focuses on balancing economic, social, and environmental dimensions, with the goal of enhancing resilience, responsibility, and sustainable development. In this study, the innovative method of polar coordinate distance based on lost opportunities in the field of multi-criteria decision-making has been examined for analyzing and evaluating eighteen of the best commercial companies under uncertainty conditions. The advantages of this technique, while possessing a strong logic of lost opportunities and its validation compared to other techniques, include the ability to easily evaluate and rank options. The results show that Company A2, with the lowest lost opportunity value (DOL = 0.0199), ranks first, and Company A11, with the highest lost opportunity (DOL = 0.0808), ranks last in terms of sustainable leadership. Additionally, criteria such as sustainable profitability, occupational health and safety, and waste management, with the lowest lost opportunities and highest performance, rank at the top for evaluating company managers and their sustainable performance, while criteria like market competitiveness and natural resource conservation require strategic reforms and performance improvements. This technique, by combining lost opportunities and using the polar distance approach, provides a unique perspective in evaluation and ranking; such that a smaller distance indicates fewer lost opportunities. This makes understanding and comparing options easier for decision-makers and managers, leading to more precise and effective decision-making in various fields.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable Leadership
OPLO-POCOD Approach
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Performance Evaluation
Managers

Copyright © Azadeh Ashrafi, Hossein Sheikh, Ali Avar

 

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Adanma, U. M., & Ogunbiyi, E. O. (2024). A comparative review of global environmental policies for promoting sustainable development and economic growth. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(5), 954–977. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i5.1147
Agboola, P. O., Bekun, F. V., Agozie, D. Q., & Gyamfi, B. A. (2022). Environmental sustainability and ecological balance dilemma: Accounting for the role of institutional quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(49), 74554–74568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21103-2
Ahmad, S. (2025). Entrepreneurship and sustainable leadership practices: Examine how entrepreneurial leaders incorporate sustainability into their business models and the leadership traits facilitating this integration. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Venturing, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.56536/jebv.v5i1.182
Ashfaq, F., Abid, G., Ilyas, S., & Elahi, A. R. (2025). Sustainable leadership and work engagement: Exploring sequential mediation of organizational support and gratitude. Public Organization Review, 25(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-024-00778-w
Avazpoor, M., Zarei, J., & Alinejad, E. (2025). Evaluation and prioritization of electricity generation technologies in Iran using a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Systems Engineering and Productivity, 5(3), 179–198 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2063697.1333
Banaei, G., & Maleki, M. R. (2022). Investigating the relationship between senior management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in organizations with a total quality management program. System Engineering and Productivity1(1), 99-120. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2022.243399
Barua, S. (2020). Financing sustainable development goals: A review of challenges and mitigation strategies. Business Strategy & Development, 3(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.94
Bashynska, I., Malynovska, Y., Kolinko, N., Bielialov, T., Järvis, M., Kovalska, K., & Saiensus, M. (2024). Performance assessment of sustainable leadership of enterprise’s circular economy-driven innovative activities. Sustainability, 16(2), Article 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020558
Boeske, J. (2023). Leadership towards sustainability: A review of sustainable, sustainability, and environmental leadership. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612626
Boikanyo, D. H. (2025). Adaptive leadership in times of organizational change driven by digital technologies. In Contemporary perspectives on organizational behaviour (p. 37). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007826
Chauke, S., Sobiyi, K., & Mbohwa, C. (2018). Three pillars of sustainability: An overview. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 2578–2579).
Ellis, S. J. (2025). Strategic leadership: Navigating dilemmas during incumbent entry into nascent ecosystems. Radboud University Press. https://doi.org/10.54195/9789465150239
Fridayani, J. A., Kuntara, A. D., & Kusuma, S. E. (2023). Sustainable leadership to create sustainable organization: Identify effect from pandemic era. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 28(3), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.35760/eb.2023.v28i3.8219
Gholamian, S. A. (2025). Evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers by providing a decision support system based on a new data envelopment analysis model and cumulative star utility. System Engineering and Productivity4(1), 1-13. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2025845.1198
Hristov, I., & Chirico, A. (2019). The role of sustainability key performance indicators (KPIs) in implementing sustainable strategies. Sustainability, 11(20), Article 5742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205742
Hristov, I., Appolloni, A., & Chirico, A. (2022). The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five-dimensional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3216–3230. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3072
Kashanian Monfared, N., Safaie, N., & Hosseininezhad, S. J. (2025). A decision-making model for the problem of designing the layout of medical centers considering uncertainty. System Engineering and Productivity, 5(2), 97–118 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2049327.1252
Khaledi, R., Heydariyeh, S. A., & Hematian, H. (2025). Analysis and design of a human resource productivity improvement model in the public sector (a study in the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education). System Engineering and Productivity5(2), 119-147 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2047029.1240
Liao, Y. (2022). Sustainable leadership: A literature review and prospects for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1045570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1045570
Mandal, V., & Pal, D. (2025). Sustainable leadership: Empowering green organizational citizenship behaviour through employee green value in the Indian healthcare sector. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 19(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-08-2023-0338
Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., & Raziq, M. M. (2024). Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2849–2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3631
Sakalasooriya, N. (2021). Conceptual analysis of sustainability and sustainable development. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93026
Sheikh, R., & Senfi, S. (2024a). A novel opportunity losses-based polar coordinate distance (OPLO-POCOD) approach to multiple criteria decision-making. Journal of Mathematics, 2024, Article 8845886. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8845886
Sheikh, R., & Senfi, S. (2024b). Evaluation and ranking of stock funds using opportunity losses-based polar coordinate distance (OPLO-POCOD) technique. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 14(3), 117–140 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.48308/jimp.14.3.117
Singh, A., & Jha, S. (2024). Navigating strategic leadership: Unraveling the dynamics of technological innovation in organizations. In Review of technologies and disruptive business strategies (pp. 205–227). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2754-586520240000003011
Torabi, H., Hosnavi, R., & Arabi, R. (2025). Identifying factors affecting human capital enhancement through knowledge sharing (a case study of Daneshmand Institute). System Engineering and Productivity5(2), 73-95. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2052956.1267
Zada, M., Khan, S., Zada, S., & Dhar, B. K. (2025). Driving sustainable development through CSR leadership: Insights into organizational learning and technological innovation. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3341

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 26 بهمن 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 07 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 26 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 26 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 26 بهمن 1404