تأثیر ادراک از حمایت حقوقی از نوآوری بر قصد کارآفرینی دانشجویان: نقش میانجی نگرش و خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه

اسماعیلی اول, اکرم; آقایی بجستان, محمدرضا

doi:10.22034/sep.2026.2105021.1553

تأثیر ادراک از حمایت حقوقی از نوآوری بر قصد کارآفرینی دانشجویان: نقش میانجی نگرش و خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

اکرم اسماعیلی اول ¹

محمدرضا آقایی بجستان ²

¹ گروه مهندسی صنایع، مجتمع آموزش عالی گناباد، گناباد، ایران

² گروه حقوق، مجتمع آموزش عالی گناباد، گناباد، ایران

10.22034/sep.2026.2105021.1553

چکیده

حمایت حقوقی از نوآوری یکی از مؤلفه‌های محیط فعالیت‌های کارآفرینانه دانشگاهی است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه ادراک از حمایت حقوقی از نوآوری با قصد کارآفرینی دانشجویان، با در نظر گرفتن نقش میانجی نگرش به کارآفرینی و خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه انجام شد. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی‌-‌پیمایشی و همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل دانشجویان سال آخر مجتمع آموزش عالی گناباد بود که از میان آن‌ها، ۱۳۲ نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه‌ای متشکل از مقیاس‌های استاندارد و گویه‌های محقق‌ساخته گردآوری شد. برای ارزیابی مدل و آزمون فرضیه‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم‌افزارهای R و SmartPLS استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد ادراک از حمایت حقوقی با نگرش به کارآفرینی و خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه رابطه مثبت و معناداری دارد و این دو متغیر نیز با قصد کارآفرینی رابطه مثبت و معنادار دارند. مسیرهای غیرمستقیم ادراک حمایت حقوقی به قصد کارآفرینی از طریق نگرش و خودکارآمدی مثبت و معنادار بودند؛ در مقابل، ضریب مسیر مستقیم این ادراک به قصد، پس از ورود دو متغیر میانجی به مدل، منفی به دست آمد. این تفاوت جهت، الگویی سازگار با میانجی‌گری رقابتی را نشان می‌دهد. یافته‌ها بر اهمیت بررسی هم‌زمان مسیرهای مستقیم و غیرمستقیم و توجه به نگرش و خودکارآمدی در مطالعه رابطه ادراک حمایت حقوقی با قصد کارآفرینی تأکید دارند.

تازه های تحقیق

ادراک از حمایت حقوقی، نگرش و خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه دانشجویان را به‌طور معناداری تقویت می‌کند.
اثر مستقیم حمایت حقوقی بر قصد کارآفرینی منفی، اما اثر غیرمستقیم آن مثبت است.
قوانین حمایتی تنها در صورت ارتقای خودباوری و نگرش مثبت در دانشجویان، به راه‌اندازی کسب‌وکار منجر می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ادراک حمایت حقوقی

قصد کارآفرینی

نگرش به کارآفرینی

خودکارآمدی کارآفرینانه

مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری

موضوعات

مدیریت دولتی

عنوان مقاله English

The Impact of Perceived Legal Support for Innovation on Students' Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Attitude and Self-Efficacy

نویسندگان English

Akram Esmaeili Avval ¹

Mohammad Reza Aghayi Bajestan ²

¹ Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran

² Department of Law, University of Gonabad, Gonabad, Iran

چکیده English

Legal support for innovation is a component of the environment for university-based entrepreneurial activities. This study examined the relationship between perceived legal support for innovation and students’ entrepreneurial intention, considering the mediating roles of entrepreneurial attitude and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. The research was applied in purpose and employed a descriptive, correlational survey design. The study population comprised final-year students at the University of Gonabad, from whom 132 participants were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising standardized scales and researcher-developed items. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), implemented using R and SmartPLS, was employed to assess the model and test the hypotheses. The results indicated that perceived legal support was positively and significantly associated with entrepreneurial attitude and entrepreneurial self-efficacy, both of which were also positively and significantly associated with entrepreneurial intention. The indirect pathways linking perceived legal support to entrepreneurial intention through attitude and self-efficacy were positive and significant. In contrast, the direct path coefficient was negative after both mediators were included in the model. These opposing directions indicated a pattern consistent with competitive mediation. The findings highlight the importance of examining direct and indirect pathways simultaneously and considering entrepreneurial attitude and self-efficacy when investigating the relationship between perceived legal support and entrepreneurial intention.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Perceived legal support

Entrepreneurial intention

Entrepreneurial attitude

Entrepreneurial self-efficacy

Structural equation modeling

Copyright © Akram Esmaeili Avval, Mohammad Reza Aghayi Bajestan

License

This article is released under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone is free to copy, share, translate, and adapt this article for any purpose, whether commercial or non-commercial, as long as proper citation is given to the authors and original publication.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995

Anjum, T., Amoozegar, A., Farrukh, M., & Heidler, P. (2022). Entrepreneurial intentions among business students: The mediating role of attitude and the moderating role of university support. Education + Training, 64(4), 587-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2021-0020

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.

Batista-Canino, R. M., Sosa-Cabrera, S., Santana-Hernández, L., & Medina-Brito, P. (2024). A scientometric analysis to guide future research on tourism entrepreneurship. In Tourism entrepreneurship: Knowledge and challenges for a sustainable future (pp. 191–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61249-7_11

Bird, B. J. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intentions. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–454. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306970

Boutaky, S., & Sahib Eddine, A. (2023). Determinants of entrepreneurial intention among scientific students: A social cognitive theory perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 37(2), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221120750

Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800404

Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1999). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1999(1), 73-87.

Dieguez, T., & Gomes, S. (2025). Bridging intention and action in sustainable university entrepreneurship: The role of motivation and institutional support. Administrative Sciences, 15(11), 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15110422

Doern, R., & Goss, D. (2013). The role of negative emotions in the social processes of entrepreneurship: Power rituals and shame-related appeasement behaviors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 863–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12026

Dunyo, S. K., & Odei, S. A. (2023). Firm-level innovations in an emerging economy: Do perceived policy instability and legal institutional conditions matter?. Sustainability, 15(3), 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021570

Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024

Galvão, A. R., Marques, C. S., Mendes, T., & Azevedo, C. (2025). How does perceived university support boost students’ entrepreneurial intentions?. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(3), 12698-12726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02441-7

Gonzalez-Tamayo, L. A., Olarewaju, A. D., Bonomo-Odizzio, A., & Krauss-Delorme, C. (2024). University student entrepreneurial intentions: the effects of perceived institutional support, parental role models, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(8), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2022-0408

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Heydari, M., & Ghayebloo, S. (2026). Analyzing challenges in the innovation ecosystem of Zanjan province: A study of knowledge-based companies in science and technology parks. System Engineering and Productivity, 6(1), 39-61 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2025.2065805.1353

Jackson, S. (2010). Mulling over Massachusetts: Health insurance mandates and entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 909–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00351.x

Jee, S. J., & Sohn, S. Y. (2023). Perceived importance of intellectual property protection methods by Korean SMEs involved in product innovation and their value appropriation. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(6), 2561-2587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1913597

Karimi, S. (2015). Studying the direct, indirect and moderating effects of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intentions of agricultural students. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 8(2), 371-390 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2015.55985

Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056

Keyvani Shahri, F. S., Kaveh, D., Karimi, M., & Zendehdel, A. (2024). Identifying the dimensions and components of entrepreneurship with a social responsibility approach in the General Directorate of Education. Journal of System Engineering and Productivity, 4(2), 75-92 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/msb.2024.2032004.1216

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Krueger, N. F. (2008). Entrepreneurial resilience: Real & perceived barriers to implementing entrepreneurial intentions. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1155269

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0

Kwapisz, A. (2019). Do government and legal barriers impede entrepreneurship in the U.S.? An exploratory study of perceived vs. actual barriers. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00114

Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x

Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5

Magableh, K. N. Y., Kannan, S., & Hmoud, A. Y. R. (2026). Effect of entrepreneurial self-efficacy on entrepreneurial success among females in Australia: The role of institutional support and resilience. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-026-00696-9

Mahfuda, T., Triyonoa, M. B., Sudiraa, P., & Mulyani, Y. (2020). The influence of social capital and entrepreneurial attitude orientation on entrepreneurial intentions: The mediating role of psychological capital. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.12.005

Nabi-Meybodi, M., Abbasi-Meybodi, Z., & Motiei-Bahabadi, A. (2027). Developing a skills framework for enhancing employability of management students in startup and freelancing work environments. System Engineering and Productivity, 7(1), 1-39 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2026.2090179.1502

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Pourvaei, A., Mahboobi, M. R., & Sharifzadeh, M. S. (2020). Investigating factors affecting students' entrepreneurial intention, the case of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. J Entrepreneurial Strategies Agric., 7(14), 103-115 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.52547/jea.7.14.103

Rahimiaghdam, S., Joudi, S., Javidanmehr, F., & Ebrahimpouraghdam, M. (2026). The impact of enterprise social media on the productivity of employees, considering the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of workplace incivility. System Engineering and Productivity, 6(4), 26-53 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/sep.2026.2082738.1455

Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., Yani-De-Soriano, M., & Muffatto, M. (2015). The role of perceived university support in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12090

Santos, S. C., & Liguori, E. W. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intentions: Outcome expectations as mediator and subjective norms as moderator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2019-0436

Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Prentice-Hall.

Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314541153

Shiri, N., Mirakzadeh, A., & Zarafshani, K. (2024). Conceptualization of contextual factors of entrepreneurial intention in the Iranian higher education system. Education and Management of Entrepreneurship, 2(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.22126/eme.2023.2495

Townsend, D. M., & Hart, T. A. (2008). Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00248

Trivedi, R. H. (2017). Entrepreneurial-intention constraint model: A comparative analysis among post-graduate management students in India, Singapore and Malaysia. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1239–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0449-4

Zhang, J., & Huang, J. (2021). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy mediates the impact of the post-pandemic entrepreneurship environment on college students’ entrepreneurial intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 643184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643184